This article was sent to us by Col. Ray Schrecengost, USAF Ret.
The new F-35 short take-off
and vertical-landing Joint Strike Fighter
Jet lets fingers do the flying

|
|
|
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter's
touch screens, voice activated commands and helmet-mounted displays are
cutting edge. LOCKHEED
MARTIN PHOTOS |
By JACK DORSEY, The Virginian-Pilot
© January 22, 2006
VIRGINIA BEACH: Five dozen men,
many of them former pilots who have helped shape naval aviation for the past 50
years, were spellbound as they looked into the simulated cockpit of the Navy's
next-generation fighter jet.
Two 8-by-20-inch touch screen displays
dominated the dashboard.
Tapping
the screen changes radio channels. Touching it elsewhere selects a weapon to
use: missile, bomb, cannon.
Pointing to a landing spot on the map
display tells the computer to fly the plane there nearly hands off.
A visual system built into the pilot's
helmet projects an image onto the visor, giving real-time navigation and
targeting information. No matter which way the pilot's head turns, the data are
always in view.
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
will use a more powerful
engine - nearly twice the kick of current engines -
stealth technology and touch screen and voice
commands in the cockpit to stake its claim as
the world's premier strike aircraft through 2040.
Voice commands are integrated into the
controls to rapidly react to changing mission requirements.
There is no control stick in the floor.
It's been replaced by sliding knobs on each side of the cockpit, with fingertip
switches.
The one on the left is the throttle.
The right one controls direction.
If you have two fingers and can touch
the screen, you can fly this thing, an F/A-18 Hornet pilot quipped from the
back of the crowd of admirers.
This is the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter,
an amalgam of cutting-edge fighter technology. It will cost between $37 million
and $48 million, depending on which of three models is bought.
Although top Pentagon officials are
thinking about cutting the size and scope of the F-35 program to reduce defense
budgets, for now the plan is a $256 billion, 20-year program to build 3,500 to
4,000 planes.
Up to 6,000 could be turned out when
sales to America's NATO allies are counted.
Nearly ready for flight
The F-35 is scheduled to go into flight
less than a year after the first plane rolls off a Texas assembly line in
October. The planes could come to Oceana Naval Air Station in Virginia Beach in
about 2013 as a replacement for the F/A-18 C and D model Hornets.
Marine Corps Lt. Col. Arthur Turbo
Tomassetti, the only pilot to have flown all three versions of the fighter,
promises that its pilots are in for a treat.
On the Navy and Marine side, we don't
have stealth airplanes yet, so just the fact we are getting one of those is a
huge deal, said Tomassetti, chief test pilot and commanding officer of Air Test
and Evaluation Squadron 23 at Patuxent River Naval Air Station in Maryland .
At war, the F-35 would be among the
first jets to enter the conflict to support troops on the ground or knock out
missile sites. It also would be able to engage enemy targets in the sky.
It has two bomb bays and 11 places for
wing-mounted weapons.
Its low radar profile gives it stealth,
while a revolutionary new radar inside the plane will allow it 360-degree
vision to better evade attackers.
It will be the first airplane that
allows pilots to remain unseen yet still communicate by radio . The F-35 will
not carry any iron, or dumb, bombs, only next-generation guided munitions.
The uniqueness of the F-35, Tomassetti
said, is not in an individual piece of equipment.
We already have touch screens,
voice-activated cockpits and in-helmet displays, he said. But now what you are
talking about is a combination of the helmet-mounted display, touch screens and
voice activation. That's never been done all in one before.
Plans call for the F-35 to be a multi
national premier strike aircraft through 2040. The plane will allow the Air Force
to field an almost all-stealth fighter force by 2025.
The F-35 would replace the Marine Corps
aging AV-8B Harriers, the Air Force's A-10 Thunderbolts and F-16 Falcons, the
Navy F/A-18C Hornets and the United Kingdom's Harriers, both its air force and
navy versions.
Lockheed Martin is developing the plane
with its principal industrial partners, Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems.
Two separate, interchangeable engines
are under development: one by Pratt & Whitney and the other by the General
Electric/Rolls-Royce Fighter Engine Team.
Headed to Oceana?
For Oceana, 100 or more F-35s could
replace the F/A-18C Hornets. They would serve beside the newer F/A-18 E and F
model Super Hornets.
Then again, that might not happen, said
Rear Adm. Steven Enewold, the executive officer of the Joint Strike Fighter
Program.
It is not clear to me yet that we
wouldn't have a consolidated JSF base somewhere that would have all three
versions, Enewold said from his Washington office.
It would be natural to bring them
together because the planes have the same engines and avionics and require the
same technical skills to maintain and operate them, he said.
It is not a far stretch to think we
might have an Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps consolidation base somewhere, he
said.
The Navy must decide this year where to
base its F-35s.
The pros are impressed
Enewold brought his presentation and a
mock-up of the F-35's cockpit to Oceana in August.
Members of the Association of Naval Aviation
Hampton Roads Squadron marveled at the aircraft's gadgets and technology.
It has tools that weren't even dreams
20 years ago, said retired Vice Adm. Dick Dunleavy of Virginia Beach.
It is the future, and we are going
forward with it, said the former A-6 Intruder bombardier/navigator, who
commanded the aircraft carrier Coral Sea and the Atlantic Fleet's air arm.
Despite his concerns about the
aircraft's cost, he's impressed by its innovations.
That is our strength as
Americans our technology and our people and they put both of them in there
quite well.
But the aviators also had questions.
Among them: What about jet noise?
It is the No. 1 issue among many who
live and work near Oceana, the Navy's only master jet base on the East Coast.
We don't know yet, said Enewold, who
has been with the program since January 2002. The engine is about the same
thrust as the F-14 and will make the same kind of noise.
However, the plane's single engine is
so powerful that we don't see any reason to operate the afterburner around the
field, Enewold said.
Since the engine has not yet been
mounted in the first F-35 the Pratt & Whitney model is being installed
its exact loudness isn't known.
The engines large size may help lessen
its noise, though.
I hear that because it is a bigger
engine, it is not near as shrill, said John Smith, a Lockheed Martin spokesman
at the company's Fort Worth, Texas, plant. It has a lower sound to it, maybe
the same decibels, but it is not the same ear-splitting decibels as the F-18
with its two smaller engines.
International interest
The F-35 program emphasizes
collaboration among NATO nations, including Britain, Italy, Norway, Turkey,
Australia, Canada and Denmark.
It is like no other program I have been
associated with, Enewold said.
The plane is designed to have a long
range, to use common hardware and software, to be used and maintained by all
service branches and to be highly reliable.
You can schedule maintenance when you
want it, because it will tell you when it will break, Enewold said.
Even its construction is revolutionary,
according to Lockheed Martin.
There are three sub- assembly points:
The forward fuselage is being built in Fort Worth by Lockheed Martin; BAE
Systems is building the aft fuselage and tails in Samlesbury, England; and
Northrop Grumman is constructing the center fuselage in Palmdale, Calif.
Once the sub sections are completed,
they will be sent to the Fort Worth plant, Smith said.
The first production plane began to
take shape just before Christmas in Forth Worth with the installation of
horizontal tails, which joined the aft fuselage and forward fuselage.
For the first time in history, we will
have a moving assembly line for a fighter, Smith said. There have been moving
assembly lines for commercial airliners and other things, but not for a
fighter.
Its engine is to be installed this
week.
Final assembly will take five to six
months instead of 13 months for previous aircraft, the company said.
Once full production rates are achieved
in the 2013 time frame, we will be building a plane a day. Our goal is 20 per
month, Smith said.
Love and hate
While Tomassetti believes former Marine
Corps AV-8B Harrier pilots will be more than pleased with the F-35, he's not
sure other fliers will be.
If you talk to a Harrier guy, they are
very excited, he said. It's all good to them.
That's mainly because the F-35 short
take-off and vertical-landing model will have all digitized controls, allowing
computers to do the things that burden a Harrier pilot.
Basically you have three things to move
with your two hands, he said of the Harrier.
It's a very busy aircraft.
However, the F-35 is not without its
detractors.
Talk to the F-18 guys and they are
complaining it is a single engine, Tomassetti said.
Since the late 1960s, the Navy has
preferred twin engines for its carrier-based aircraft but has lived with single
engines in the A-7 Corsairs and A-4 Skyhawks.
Some Air Force pilots may not be
thrilled either.
The F-16 guys will say it is not as
fast, or potentially maneuverable, Tomassetti said. Some of the folks flying
the cutting-edge stuff say, 'They can't do with this thing that my current
airplane can do.
All that aside, Tomassetti said, there
are some tremendous capabilities with stealth and sensors far ahead of what's
now available in combat aircraft.
Everything you will get in the F-35 is
better than what we get today.
Reach Jack Dorsey at (757) 446-2284 or
jack.dorsey@pilotonline.com.
**************************
The
first flight of a production-line model is scheduled for October, with
operational aircraft set for delivery in 2007.
STATUS
The
Joint Strike Fighter is halfway through a 10-year development and testing
phase.
A
total of 22 test aircraft will be built during the current phase: 14 for flight
tests, seven for tests on the ground and one for radar tests.
Flight
tests will be conducted at Edwards Air Force Base in California, Patuxent River
Naval Air Station in Maryland and near the Lockheed Martin plant in Fort Worth,
Texas. The Navy and Marine variants will undergo sea trials aboard U.S.,
British and Italian aircraft carriers.
Lockheed
Martin expects to complete 20 planes in a month once full production begins in
2013. The plane will be built on a moving assembly line - a first for a
fighter. Final assembly will take only five months. Most fighters are assembled
in 13 months.
A
total of 2,852 aircraft are scheduled for delivery to the Air Force, Navy, Marine
Corps and to the British Royal Navy and Air Force.
ENGINE

The
F-35 will have two interchangeable choices for its single engine, either of
which will deliver 40,000 pounds of thrust - more than twice as much as each of
the F/A-18 Hornet's twin engines.
The
Air Force and Navy versions of the F-35 will use engines built by Pratt &
Whitney, above. General Electric and Rolls-Royce are teaming up to build the
Marine Corps version, which will be able to take of vertically and hover.
COCKPIT

Instead
of "heads-up" readouts projected onto fighter cockpit windows, the
F-35 will use a system contained within the pilot's helmet. An Israeli firm is
developing the technology.
In
addition, the vertical-takeoff version of the F-35 will be controlled by only a
throttle, as opposed to the three primary controls used in a conventional
Harrier jet. the swiveling exhaust nozzles will be controlled instead by a
computer.